|
|
Rank: Addict
Joined: 3/17/2008
Posts: 818
Location: Nyborg, Denmark
|
@Kalle: Well thank you for all the feedback. It makes the software much better, so keep it coming :)
@Warren: Just make sure to have a backup of your old files, the upgrade doesn't affect the db. But wait till next week where the final version is ready.
Jeeeez, did I really start this :-)
|
|
Rank: Addict
Joined: 7/19/2006
Posts: 733
Location: Leigh-on-Sea, Essex, UK
|
Thanks Niels, if this is coming next week I will definately wait for it to be released and classed as "Stable" before I upgrade. //Warren
Warren Buckley an Umbraco MVP 08-09 & level 1 certified developer
|
|
Rank: Addict
Joined: 7/19/2006
Posts: 593
Location: Preston, UK
|
Guys, I have upgraded 302 site which was giving performance issues I upgraded to 305 did app pool restart and i still get the same thing. Anyone else get this issue? Regards Ismail
Level 2 certified. If it aint broke dont fix.
|
|
Rank: Addict
Joined: 7/19/2006
Posts: 593
Location: Preston, UK
|
Guys, Update on this. After the upgrade i still could not publish. Basically i would try and it would die and restart the app pool. So i deleted the umbraco.config cache file in data directory. I then touched the web.config (just added carriage return to restart umbraco ) the website republished and the page i was trying to publish actually published. I also then published some more pages and it all worked. Speed / performance is spot on. Here now is the really weird bit in my data directory i dont have an umbraco.config file although the site all works i am very confused  In my umbracoSettings.config i have Code:
<XmlCacheEnabled>True</XmlCacheEnabled>
<!-- Update disk cache every time content has changed -->
<ContinouslyUpdateXmlDiskCache>True</ContinouslyUpdateXmlDiskCache>
so where is the cache file? Regards Ismail
Level 2 certified. If it aint broke dont fix.
|
|
Rank: Umbracoholic
Joined: 9/8/2006
Posts: 1,410
Location: KY, USA
|
Is I understand it, the cache is in the server's memory even if it isn't written to the filesystem. But that doesn't answer why it isn't on the filesystem as well. I've seen something similar in two situations. The first was bad file permissions after an upgrade. In fact, I now think of "check the file permissions" whenever there is any weirdness of any kind just like I used to think "reboot windows" when I was on Win95/98. Wrong file permissions cause all sorts of bizzare behavior that often don't even look like permission problems. The second scenario in which I've seen this behavior was when there were multiple sites in a single umbraco installation (www.example.com and www.sample.com, for instance). AND... there were two IIS websites and each website pointed to the same umbraco database. Each IIS site handled one of the domains. One site would work perfectly but the other would have publishing problems and the config file wouldn't show up. The proper way to set this up is to have only as many IIS sites as you have umbraco installations. Just use hostheaders in your IIS site for all the domains, and use the umbraco hostnames to direct requests to the right section of the umbraco content tree. Any chance you have either of these situations? cheers, doug.
MVP 2007-2009 - Official Umbraco Trainer for North America - Percipient Studios
|
|
Rank: Addict
Joined: 7/19/2006
Posts: 593
Location: Preston, UK
|
Doug,
With regards to permissions its all on host and i transferred via ftp. That shouldnt have changed permissions should it? Everything else works fine saving a css, publish create media etc. The umbraco install is only running the one site. I also did another upgrade on another site and that all worked fine the umbraco.config is there. It all works so im not too concerned at the moment although it would be nice to get to the bottom of it.
Regards
Ismail
Level 2 certified. If it aint broke dont fix.
|
|
|
Guest |