Something wrong with ASPNET_FORM Options
stephan@tewonder.se
Posted: Thursday, November 09, 2006 6:25:21 PM

Rank: Devotee

Joined: 11/9/2006
Posts: 47
Location: Stockholm
I've created a usercontrol, that contains a number of form fields, everything normal, right?

If i don't have the
Code:
<?ASPNET_FORM>
-tag the page of course complains that i need to have my dropdownlist inside a form with runat=server, however, if i insert the aforementioned tag, i get "A page can have only one server-side Form tag."

I don't have any form tag in my user control, the user control macro is included in the master template, and the child template doesn't have any form either.

Am I doing something wrong, or is the <?ASPNET_FORM> replaced twice?

Starting top pull my hair here...

/S
stephan@tewonder.se
Posted: Thursday, November 09, 2006 8:36:40 PM

Rank: Devotee

Joined: 11/9/2006
Posts: 47
Location: Stockholm
Oh, I forgot to mention that I have installed umbraco into a virtual directory, if this has any relevance.

I find it hard to believe I'm the first to run into this problem, but if anyone is willing to point me in the right direction, I'm willing to give it a go and try to solve it, since unfortunately installing into the site root isn't an option for me.

/S
stephan@tewonder.se
Posted: Saturday, November 11, 2006 8:43:44 AM

Rank: Devotee

Joined: 11/9/2006
Posts: 47
Location: Stockholm
I decided to drop this... Not only has the virtual directory given me problems, but the hosting company (Telia) had their servers set up to store the sites on network shares, and couldn't switch to .net 2.0, so the aspnet and network service accounts on the webserver couldn't gain access to the file server - basically a configuration error from beginning to end. So if anybody else stumbles on this post, I just have to say: Permissions, permissions, permissions.

/S
duckie
Posted: Monday, November 13, 2006 8:57:53 AM
Rank: Devotee

Joined: 8/14/2006
Posts: 212
My best guess is that you have a <form> in your control. That could give you those errors :D

Signatures suck. No reason to have one.
duckie
Posted: Monday, November 13, 2006 9:11:19 AM
Rank: Devotee

Joined: 8/14/2006
Posts: 212
Also, i recommend a host change..

Signatures suck. No reason to have one.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.